The Failings of Forensic Science, Part II


Reportage in the French National Police's Criminal Research Institute in Rosny-sous-Bois, France. Finger Print Department. (Photo by: BSIP/UIG via Getty Images)

What if bad science put you in prison for a crime you didn't commit? How many guilty offenders are still out there because of pseudoscience, fraud or disorganized laboratories? In this episode of Stuff to Blow Your Mind, join Joe and Christian for part two of our review of forensic science in the courtroom. How accurate is the analysis of fingerprints, ballistics, hair, bite marks, fire and DNA?

The Failings of Forensic Science, Part II

Image Credit: BSIP/UIG via Getty Images

Related Content:

The Failings of Forensic Science, Part I (podcast)

DNA Evidence can be Fabricated (blog)

Blood Spatter and Gene Banks (blog)

How Forensic Lab Techniques Work (HowStuffWorks)

How DNA Evidence Works (HowStuffWorks)

How Crime Scene Investigation Works (HowStuffWorks)

How Forensic Dentistry Works (HowStuffWorks)

Outside Content:

CSI Myths: The Shaky Science Behind Forensics

Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward (PDF)

FBI admits flaws in hair analysis over decades

CSI Is a Lie

Topics in this Podcast: scientific method, criminal investigation, justice system, blood spatter, chromatography, fingerprint analysis, csi effect, methodology, national academy of science, the innocence project, national research council, the frye test, the daubert standard, ballistics matching, fire analysis, hair analysis, dna testing, forensics, forensic science, bite mark analysis, christian sager, pseudoscience